• This web site is a service of Prostate Cancer International.
  • Other PCI web sites

  • The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is intended for informational purposes only. It is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services.

    News and information provided on this site should not be used for diagnosing or treating any health problem or disease.

    The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, please consult your healthcare provider.

    • Perspective Confidentiality Disclosure Reliability Courtesy

Quality of prostate cancer care in the US

Penson has recently reviewed available data on the methods use to assess the quality of care, the available quality measures in prostate cancer, and the existing literature on the quality of prostate cancer care in the USA.

He describes a preliminary performance measure set initially developed by RAND Corporation researchers that were tested in multiple settings. In combination with various clinical guidelines, the RAND measures have been used as the foundation for new prostate cancer quality measures developed by the American Medical Association’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement.

According to Penson, “Recent studies document that patients undergoing radical prostatectomy had worse documented compliance with quality indicators than those undergoing external beam radiotherapy.” He goes on to state that, “There is clearly room for improvement in prostate cancer quality of care in the US. If providers do not take the initiative and address these shortcomings, providers and policymakers will implement changes that may not be in the best interests of patients.”

This conclusion appears somewhat strange to The “New” Prostate Cancer InfoLink. It seems more likely to us that any changes would be implemented by payers and policy makers and would be more likely to focus on documented ability to provide care at centers of excellence. While this might impact patients, it is more likely to impact the providers who provide lower (or even poor) quality of care. Elimination of low and poor quality care, however, would very definitely be in the longer term interests of patients!

One Response to “Quality of prostate cancer care in the US”

  1. Dr. Penson has kindly provided The “New” Prostate Cancer InfoLink with a full copy of his paper, and has acknowledged that there is indeed a typographic error in the abstract of his paper regarding the potential roles of payers and policy makers (as opposed to “providers and policymakers”).

    We note that in the full copy of his paper, Dr. Penson also emphasizes the potential future importance of “pay-for-performance” incentives to ensure that providers meet evolving quality of care standards in the management of prostate cancer.

Leave a Reply