• WHAT'S ON THIS SITE?

    (1) Articles with core information

    (2) A blog with news and opinion

    (3) Get answers to your questions from Arnon, Arthur, or Amy

    Use the green tabs at the top of every page to find your way around. Every green tab links to a full list of the content on that topic. Or just use the site map.

  • VISIT THE SOCIAL NETWORK
  • GET THE BLOG FEED

    By email ... By RSS reader

  • GENERAL DISCLAIMER

    The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is intended for informational purposes only. It is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services.

    News and information provided on this site should not be used for diagnosing or treating any health problem or disease.

    The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, please consult your healthcare provider.

PSA velocity: no role in prostate cancer screening?

The potential role of PSA velocity in screening for prostate cancer has been unclear. However, recent data from the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer  (ERSPC) appears to confirm earlier suggestions that PSA velocity (the rate of increase in PSA over time) is not an independent predictor of risk for clinically significant prostate cancer.

During the first and second ERSPC screening rounds, PSA tests were performed on 2,217 men, and all these men underwent a biopsy during the second screening round in year 4 of the study. Their PSA velocities were calculated and their biopsy outcomes were classified as benign, possibly indolent prostate cancer, or clinically significant prostate cancer, according to predetermined criteria.

A total of 441 cases of prostate cancer were detected among these 2,217 men; 333 of the cases were classified as clinically significant and 108 as possibly indolent. The authors determined that the use of cut-off values for PSA velocity would have reduced the number of biopsies but would also have led to important numbers of missed (indolent and clinically significant) cases of prostate cancer.

Leave a Reply