<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media misrepresentation, diet, and prostate cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/01/31/media-misrepresentation-diet-and-prostate-cancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/01/31/media-misrepresentation-diet-and-prostate-cancer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Michael D. (&#34;Mike&#34;) Scott</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/01/31/media-misrepresentation-diet-and-prostate-cancer/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Michael D. (&#34;Mike&#34;) Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=3718#comment-2737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathy:

Reuters Health didn&#039;t write the headline that appears in the AHIP Solutions SmartBrief e-newsletter, SmartBrief did. I don&#039;t think I am making any &quot;assumptions&quot; at all. What I am saying is that the heading and the text on the article in the AHIP version of SmartBrief is a misrepresentation of the original scientific work. The many thousands of health insurance industry executives who read this report will be potentially misled by it as a consequence of the original Reuters Health report and the way that report is presented by SmartBrief. Are you suggesting that publishers of media services like Reuters Health and SmartBrief don&#039;t have any responsibility for the accuracy of what they disseminate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy:</p>
<p>Reuters Health didn&#8217;t write the headline that appears in the AHIP Solutions SmartBrief e-newsletter, SmartBrief did. I don&#8217;t think I am making any &#8220;assumptions&#8221; at all. What I am saying is that the heading and the text on the article in the AHIP version of SmartBrief is a misrepresentation of the original scientific work. The many thousands of health insurance industry executives who read this report will be potentially misled by it as a consequence of the original Reuters Health report and the way that report is presented by SmartBrief. Are you suggesting that publishers of media services like Reuters Health and SmartBrief don&#8217;t have any responsibility for the accuracy of what they disseminate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy M</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/01/31/media-misrepresentation-diet-and-prostate-cancer/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=3718#comment-2736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike,

You are making several assumptions that are misleading. I know the people at SmartBrief. They are basically a newsclipping service for newsletters for various industries. Are you saying that this article was inappropriate for their newsletter?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>You are making several assumptions that are misleading. I know the people at SmartBrief. They are basically a newsclipping service for newsletters for various industries. Are you saying that this article was inappropriate for their newsletter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

