• The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink has been developed to become a primary source of accurate, current, and topical information about prostate cancer for patients and their families.
  • This web site is a service of Prostate Cancer International.

    pcai_cmyk

  • Other PCI web sites

  • The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is intended for informational purposes only. It is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services.

    News and information provided on this site should not be used for diagnosing or treating any health problem or disease.

    The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, please consult your healthcare provider.

    • Perspective Confidentiality Disclosure Reliability Courtesy

Additional evidence of the value of brachytherapy + EBRT + ADT in high-risk patients

Earlier today we reported data from a series of patients treated by Stock et al. with brachytherapy + external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). According to a HealthDay report published in Forbes magazine, a second paper appears to endorse the findings of Stock and his colleagues.

D’Amico et al. have reported on data from 1,342 men with a PSA level > 20 ng/ml, clinical T3 or T4 disease, and/or a Gleason score of 8 to 10. All patients received brachytherapy. They then estimated the risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality after brachytherapy alone or in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or both in this high-risk population. It should be clearly pointed out, however, that this study reports retrospective analysis of data from several patient series, and is not data from a randomized clinical trial.

They showed that, despite higher baseline probabilities of prostate cancer-specific mortality, after a median follow-up of 5.1 years:

  • There was a significant reduction in the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in men treated with brachytherapy + ADT + EBRT as compared with neither.
  • When compared with brachytherapy alone, a significant decrease in the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality was not observed in men treated with either supplemental ADT or EBRT.
  • There was a near-significant reduction in the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in men treated with tri- as compared with bimodality therapy.

The authors conclude that, “Supplemental [ADT] and EBRT but not either supplement compared with brachytherapy alone was associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with high-risk prostate cancer.

“Despite the increasing numbers of men worldwide who choose to undergo brachytherapy alone for their high-risk prostate cancer, the evidence supporting this treatment method alone based on survival data from randomized trials is lacking,” Dr. Anthony D’Amico stated in a news release from Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston.

“In order to get the highest cure rate for men with high-risk prostate cancer, it appears that 5 weeks of external beam radiation and at least 4 months of hormonal therapy should be added to brachytherapy,” he added.


Leave a Reply