<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More evidence that deferring treatment can work just fine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/09/14/more-evidence-that-deferring-treatment-can-work-just-fine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/09/14/more-evidence-that-deferring-treatment-can-work-just-fine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5thString</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/09/14/more-evidence-that-deferring-treatment-can-work-just-fine/#comment-5921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[5thString]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=6868#comment-5921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090831212956.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this statement speaks volumes&lt;/a&gt; regarding the PSA test and its sensible use, re &quot;watchful waiting:&quot;

&quot;If this approach was more broadly accepted as a standard care option for suitable low-risk prostate cancers, it might help us avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to the PSA test,&quot; he adds. &quot;Instead of just abandoning the PSA test because it might be leading to an overdiagnosis of prostate cancer, we could conduct PSA screening in a way that allows more aggressive prostate cancers to be treated, while less aggressive tumors could initially be monitored. This would avoid problems due to treatment of &#039;overdiagnosed&#039; low-risk cancers, while preserving the lifesaving benefits of treating aggressive cancers that have been detected through PSA testing.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090831212956.htm" rel="nofollow">this statement speaks volumes</a> regarding the PSA test and its sensible use, re &#8220;watchful waiting:&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If this approach was more broadly accepted as a standard care option for suitable low-risk prostate cancers, it might help us avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to the PSA test,&#8221; he adds. &#8220;Instead of just abandoning the PSA test because it might be leading to an overdiagnosis of prostate cancer, we could conduct PSA screening in a way that allows more aggressive prostate cancers to be treated, while less aggressive tumors could initially be monitored. This would avoid problems due to treatment of &#8216;overdiagnosed&#8217; low-risk cancers, while preserving the lifesaving benefits of treating aggressive cancers that have been detected through PSA testing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Goodbar</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/09/14/more-evidence-that-deferring-treatment-can-work-just-fine/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Goodbar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=6868#comment-5919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent article. I believe that those men who are over 70 years of age should think long and hard before they pursue any surgical, medicinal or radiographic treatment. The side effects and hence the quality of life is generally very poor. Most doctors are more interested in saving your life and not your quality of life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article. I believe that those men who are over 70 years of age should think long and hard before they pursue any surgical, medicinal or radiographic treatment. The side effects and hence the quality of life is generally very poor. Most doctors are more interested in saving your life and not your quality of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

