We do not offer phone or e-mail consultation. However, if you join our social network we can certainly help you to understand the most appropriate options available to you for treatment … if treatment is even necessary at all.

Unlike so much of the research we see published on this board, this is a step in right direction toward ending prostate cancer death in our time, and without the side effects so common to current main stream treatment methods.

Assuming this is the case, and considering the acknowledged limitations of current technology to identify very early occurring cellular changes (micro) and the multi-focal tendencies of the disease, what gives us any confidence that such focal treatment will ELIMINATE PCa? This is particularly true when one considers that approximately 20 to 30 percent of radical prostatectomy and radiation patients, EVENTUALLY, recur.

It should be understood by newly diagnosed patients, that “focal” treatment, of any kind, has yet to prove itself in long range results and must be considered highly “experimental.” Providing that is clearly understood and the patient accepts the obvious risks inherent in such experiments, then he has the right to involve himself in such a “trial,” whether others think it is wise or not.

When there are alternatives available, with known statistical findings exhibiting high rates of success, I guess I would tend to take the known over the unknown. If the rates of success were unusually low, as in SOME more advanced PCa cases, I would likely be far more eager to ride the investigational wave, and to do so with optimism. – John@newPCa.org (aka) az4peaks