<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDA to rule on approval of Provenge by May 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/11/20/fda-to-rule-on-approval-of-provenge-by-may-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/11/20/fda-to-rule-on-approval-of-provenge-by-may-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitemaster</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/11/20/fda-to-rule-on-approval-of-provenge-by-may-2010/#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sitemaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=7289#comment-8132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Favus:

It is certainly true that, in theory, FDA could convene another advisory board meeting to address the application to approve Provenge. However, frankly, since they are required to rule on this approve within the next 14 days, it would seem extraordinary to me that, if they had any intention of convening such a panel, they had not announced it by now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Favus:</p>
<p>It is certainly true that, in theory, FDA could convene another advisory board meeting to address the application to approve Provenge. However, frankly, since they are required to rule on this approve within the next 14 days, it would seem extraordinary to me that, if they had any intention of convening such a panel, they had not announced it by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Favus</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/11/20/fda-to-rule-on-approval-of-provenge-by-may-2010/#comment-8130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliot Favus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=7289#comment-8130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on my research there is still the possibility of Provenge going to a panel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my research there is still the possibility of Provenge going to a panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2009/11/20/fda-to-rule-on-approval-of-provenge-by-may-2010/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/?p=7289#comment-7958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m looking foward Provenge&#039;s approval. My father needs it. 

Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking foward Provenge&#8217;s approval. My father needs it. </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

