Thank you. You are quite correct. I have modified the text above accordingly. Sometimes I try to do too many things with one hand tied behind my back.

With all due respect, I believe your statement (quoted above) is improperly worded and thereby conveys a COMPLETELY erroneous implication. In my opinion, a careful reading of the Pierorazio et al. study abstract makes it quite clear that true question raised by the JHU Study, is whether “isolated positive bladder neck margin” should properly be classified as T4 disease. That is far different from the question posed above.

I am sure that knowledgeable readers will discern the difference, but I want to be sure that newer members are not, unintentionally, confused by a poorly worded headline. -
John@newPCa.org (aka) az4peaks