Co-morbidity, age, mortality, and early-stage prostate cancer


New data from Peter Albertsen and his colleagues at the University of Connecticut have emphasized the importance of thorough assessment of the health status and co-morbidities of older men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer before making decisions about appropriate management.

Albertsen et al. carried out a sophisticated, 10-year-long “competing risk analysis” based on data from 19,639 men, all aged 66 years or older, all diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, and all of whom received no surgery or radiation within 180 days of diagnosis. The relevant data were identified through the use of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare databases.

Here are the key results from the study:

  • In the first 10 years after their diagnosis, men with moderately and poorly differentiated prostate cancer were more likely to die from something other than prostate cancer.
  • For men with clinical stage T1c disease, depending on patient age, Gleason score, and number of co-morbidities present at diagnosis
    • 5-year overall mortality rates ranged from 11.7 to 65.7 percent.
    • 5-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates ranged from 1.1 to 16.3 percent.
    • 10-year overall mortality rates ranged from 28.8 to 94.3 percent
    • 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates ranged from 2.0 to 27.5 percent.

The authors conclude that, “Patients and clinicians should consider using comorbidity-specific data to estimate the threat posed by newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer and the threat posed by competing medical hazards.”

It is easy to make the claim that data like these reflect “ageism,” but what we are actually dealing with here are the realities of our own mortality. Some of us will live to 70; others will live to 105. Some of us will have the physical and mental capabilities of the average 65-year-old when we are 85; other will have the physical and mental capabilities of the average 105-year-old by the time we are 80. That’s real life. What is important in ensuring the highest possible quality of life for an individual patient is ensuring that we are offering the most appropriate care to that individual, not necessarily the latest technology.

“The older you get, the likelihood of benefiting from intervention becomes increasingly slim, because the risk of dying from prostate cancer becomes increasingly slim,” states Albertsen in a report from Reuters that also covers this new study.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 333 other followers