Is low-dose brachytherapy really “better” than other treatment options (redux)?

An article just published by Grimm et al. in a supplement to BJU International argues (quite persuasively) that low-dose brachytherapy is the best form of treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer.

Brachytherapy: is it really “better” as a first-line treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer?

An analysis of data on treatment of nearly 137,500 men treated for prostate cancer between 1991 and 2007 has suggested that permanent seed brachytherapy may be safer, less costly, and at least as effective as any other widely available form of first-line therapy for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

ASTRO claims “Proton therapy effective prostate cancer treatment”

A media release issued yesterday by ASTRO reads as follows:

Patient satisfaction after first-line treatment for localized prostate cancer (in Germany)

A new article in the journal Anticancer Research suggests that patients had greater satisfaction after modern forms of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) than after some other standard forms of first-line treatment. Of course the absolute truth of this conclusion may be affected by the details of the study.

Predicting sexual function after first-line treatment for prostate cancer

A newly published report in the Journal of the American Medical Association provides data (from two large cohorts of patients) on the quality of sexual function among men undergoing first-line treatment for localized prostate cancer.

New ACR Appropriateness Criteria® for locally advanced (high risk) prostate cancer

For readers who are “into” the technical details, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has just updated the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® for the use of radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced (high risk) prostate cancer.

Time-related loss of erectile function after low-dose-rate brachytherapy

It has long been understood that erectile function after first-line treatment for localized prostate cancer is affected by (a) erectile function before treatment and (b) elapsed time after treatment. However, the available data offering a careful analysis of the chronology of erectile function after first-line treatment of localized prostate cancer has been limited.

Impact of ADT on all-cause mortality in men treated with brachytherapy-based radiation therapy

The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiation therapy for men with localized prostate cancer is common. It may be used to reduce the size of the prostate prior to brachytherapy or for longer periods in men with higher risk disease to extend survival (which has been demonstrated in large-scale, randomized, multi-center clinical trials).

Race and outcomes after prostate brachytherapy

A new retrospective analysis of data from > 2,300 patients suggests that African-American men are a greater risk for biochemical disease recurrence after brachytherapy alone than Hispanics or Caucasian men, but

The long-term results of RTOG 98-05 — an innovative brachytherapy trial

The recently published long-term results of RTOG 98-05 illustrate at least one way in which we can start to get better insight into the effectiveness and safety of new forms of treatment for localized prostate cancer as compared to older forms of treatment — without having to conduct complex and socially difficult randomized clinical trials.

A matched, case-control study of EBRT + PBRT vs brachytherapy

It would be all too easy to get the idea — from the title and abstract of a recently published study — that proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) was more effective than permanent seed brachytherapy in the treatment of men with low- and some intermediate-risk prostate cancers. This would be a very inappropriate conclusion.

“The pros and and cons of prostate cancer treatment options”

The Johns Hopkins Health Alerts yesterday issued a new summary of the up- and the downsides of the four “standard” treatments for localized prostate cancer: active surveillance, radical surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy (with permanent seed implantation).

Surgery, brachytherapy, HRQOL, and the SPIRIT trial

The Surgical Prostatectomy versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial or SPIRIT was a Phase III, partially randomized clinical trial, conducted in the U.S.A. and Canada, and designed to compare radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (BT) as first-line treatments for men with localized prostate cancer.

More from the European comparative effectiveness research front

Apparently the German health system is to initiate a large trial to investigate the comparative effectiveness of four different treatments for men initially diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer, starting this year.

ACR and ASTRO issue new guideline on brachytherapy

The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly issued a new guidance document on the treatment of prostate cancer with permanent radioactive “seed” implants inserted through the perineum.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers