Is the word “cancer” out of date? What’s in a name?

An article in today’s New York Times (“‘Cancer’ or ‘weird cells’: which sounds deadlier?“) focuses on the question of whether many conditions currently referred to as “cancer” really are … and whether by calling them “cancer” we prejudice doctors and patients into taking overly aggressive action.

Out on the frontiers of research on the genetics of cancer

For those who like to know what is happening out on the farther reaches of cancer research, there is an interesting article by George Johnson in today’s New York Times.

Do cancer and non-cancer patients make equal sacrifices to pay for their meds?

Sometimes it is difficult to know what to make of data  from even the most reputable institutions. This appears to be the case for a recent study from a Harvard research team.

Prostate cancer, BPH, risk association, and a 3 million man study

A commonly raised question is whether men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are at greater risk for prostate cancer than men who have no sign of BPH. A new, nation-wide study of the male population of Denmark over the past 27 years offers us some insights.

Genomic risk, prostate cancer, endometrial cancer, linkage?

Under the “And this helps me how?” column we can now add the topic of a possible genetic link between endometrial cancer and prostate cancer (maybe).

Large employers to launch multi-year “cancer in the workplace” initiative

According to a media release issued on Thursday this week, the National Business Group on  Health has been working with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to develop and now launch a major, 3-year-long initiative to help employers address issues of cancer in the workplace.

It’s enough to make a vegan cry

The full text of a review entitled “Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk” is available on the web site of the British Journal of Cancer, and it is not good news.

Risk for secondary cancers after first-line radiation therapy for prostate cancer

There is a recognized risk for development of secondary primary cancers (SPCs) after first-line treatment with radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. However, a new article suggests that newer forms of radiation therapy may have noticeably reduced that risk.

Cancer and the media: an academic assessment

As regular readers of this blog will be aware, The “New” Prostate Cancer InfoLink is often unhappy about the “over-hyping” of certain types of scientific and medical information related to prostate cancer in the media.

Cancer development and the cellular environment

For the serious student of the biological sciences, the idea that the immediate, internal, biological environment can profoundly impact the ability of any type of cell to grow and evolve is hardly new.

Screening and cancer: the controversies are spreading

As we have suggested before in these reports, the question of whether mass, population-based screening for certain cancers (including prostate cancer) is really the best strategy for prevention of risk from the disease itself is a complex one.

Proton beam vs. intensity-modulated RT: out on the battle lines

The relative merits of proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT) and the more commonly available intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as forms of external beam radiation for prostate cancer are much debated … with minimal supportive evidence on either side of the debate because no comparative trial has ever been carried out.

AUA report and update no. 7: April 28, 2009

In an insightful plenary presentation this morning, Dr. Larry Norton offered an explanation of cancer evolution in the individual patient based on the principles of Darwinian evolution and “natural selection .”

Leonard Salz, MD, on hope and hype

Some regular readers of the cancer literature may want to see an article just published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Leonard Salz, MD (a world-famous colorectal cancer specialist) on the way in which language affects perceptions in the world of cancer communication. The article basically says we all need to be more specific [...]

The natural remission of cancer

An article in today’s New York Times, based on an article by Zahl et al. to be published next Tuesday in the Achives of Internal Medicine (but already available on line), is about to stir up a hornets’ nest in the world of cancer research.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 268 other followers