Active surveillance or immediate surgery for low-risk prostate cancer: let’s look at the math

A new study has attempted to calculate the impact of age, health status, and patient preference on the relative outcomes (and merits) of immediate surgery as compared to active surveillance for the management of low-risk prostate cancer.

Medicaid patients do get better health care than America’s uninsured

The “New” Prostate Cancer InfoLink is delighted to see the early results of a major study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research which has effectively proven that patients on Medicaid find regular doctors, see those doctors more often, feel better, are less depressed, and are better able to maintain financial stability than those [...]

One urologist’s opinion … on the value of “high tech” medicine

Craig Turner, MD, practices urology in Portland, Oregon, and for the past 6 years or so he has been carrying out laparoscopic radical prostatectomies with the help of a da Vinci robot … but he doesn’t seem to think this has made him a better prostate cancer surgeon.

Race, patterns of care, and quality of care in the USA

Barocas and Penson have offered a helpful new review of racial variation in the patterns and the quality of care offered to prostate cancer patients in the USA. The entire paper is available on line through the UroToday web site.

Three important editorials

The October issue of the Journal of Urology carries three editorials that we consider to be very important to the world of prostate cancer — for professionals and patients alike.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers