AHRQ responds to letter from Prostate Cancer Roundtable

Members of the Prostate Cancer Roundtable have received a letter from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) addressing issues raised by the Roundtable members about the draft USPSTF recommendations on use of the PSA test in screening for risk of prostate cancer.

Sebelius has NOT overruled USPSTF recommendation after all

For our US-based readers … It appears that Rep. Kucinich’s statements on his web site (reported on this web site a few days ago) are something of a political simplification of reality.

Has Sebelius overruled USPSTF recommendation on PSA screening?

According to an announcement on the web site of Congressmen Dennis Kucinich late yesterday, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has agreed to overule the draft recommendation issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) related to the use of PSA testing as a means to detect prostate cancer.

Mortality rates at 13 years of follow-up in the PLCO study

A new article published on line late Friday in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute shows “no evidence of a mortality benefit for organized annual screening in the PLCO trial compared with opportunistic screening” for prostate cancer.

Just more déjâ vu all over again

So we might as well acknowledge that the New Year is going to continue where the old year left off when it comes to the issue of testing (“screening”) men for risk of prostate cancer.

The USPSTF, communication, and the politics of cancer screening guidance

Some readers may want to review the article on the Reuters web site entitled “Health panel takes heat on cancer screening advice.”

Is mass prostate cancer screening even ethical in men ≥ 65 years of age?

Now here’s a new perspective on the value of widespread prostate cancer screening from one of the founders of Prostate Cancer Awareness Week — Dr. David Crawford of the University of Colorado Health Science Center in Denver, CO  (who is also the Chairman of the Prostate Conditions Education Council):

Cancer (and prostate cancer) screening in the elderly

The value of regular testing of increasingly elderly men and women for risk of cancer is controversial. However, a new paper in the Archives of Internal Medicine has certainly added to our knowledge of just how widespread such testing may be … at least in the USA.

Public perception and [prostate and other] cancer screenings

We aren’t sure exactly what this adds to the recent conversations, but Gallup, the market research firm, has just provided results of a poll that asked 1,102 upstanding American adults for their opinions about cancer screening.

A multi-specialty review of current evidence regarding prostate cancer screening

The October issue of the Canadian Journal of Urology contains an interesting and thorough review of the available data on the value of screening for prostate cancer as seen by a group including urologists, urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and a highly regarded primary care physician.

Prostate cancer screening (in Germany): curative or harmful?

The debate over the merits and risks of widespread screening for prostate cancer using the PSA test is hardly confined to the USA. A new article (in German) in the journal Urologie A addresses exactly the same issues as have recently received so much attention here in the States.

AUA issues full, formal comments on USPSTF draft recommendation

On November 8, the American Urological Asociation (AUA) issued its full, formal comment letter on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)’s draft recommendation of a “D” grade for the use of PSA screening in healthy men with no symptoms of prostate cancer. The AUA also issued a formal statement for the media.

The USPSTF recommendation: a cartoonist’s perspective

Larry Axmaker is an 8-year prostate cancer survivor and very happy he had regular PSA screenings!

Prostate Cancer Roundtable comments on USPSTF recommendation

Ten members of the Prostate Cancer Roundtable have today submitted a joint letter to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force commenting on the recent draft recommendation of a “D” grade for use of the PSA test in screening for prostate cancer among men who do not have symptoms that are highly suspicious for prostate cancer, [...]

PSA screening today: four points of view in the NEJM

This week’s issue issue of the New England Journal of Medicine includes four perspective articles on the recent draft recommendation about PSA screening issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers