Reassessment of the D’Amico classification for high-risk patients?


A group of Japanese researchers has suggested that it may be beneficial to subdivide the D’Amico “high risk” patient group into two subgroups.

D’Amico and his colleagues defined men with localized prostate cancer at high risk for progressive disease as those who met any one or more of the following criteria:

  • A clinical stage higher than T2b
  • A Gleason score of 8 or higher
  • A PSA level of > 20 ng/ml

In a new paper by Kita et al. (written in Japanese but with an English abstract), the authors report that, based on their series of 208 patients treated surgically between 1997 and 205, men in the high-risk category according to the D’Amico risk criteria consisted of patients with a range of prognoses. They therefore suggest that it might be beneficial to subdivide the current D’Amico high-risk patient group into the following two subgroups:

  • A semi-high-risk group of patients that met only one of the three criteria listed above
  • A very high-risk group of patients that met two or more of the three criteria listed above

When Kita et al. reclassified their own patients according to these criteria, they were able to show that men in the very high-risk group had prostate cancer recurrence at a significantly higher rate than those in the semi-high-risk group (p=0. 021).

Now we do need to be careful about this recommendation. The number of men in the high-risk category in the study by Kita et al. is small (n = 50) and it does appear as though Kita et al. may have been including men with Gleason 7 disease as being at high risk (which does not, in fact, comply with the original D’Amico risk criteria). On top of that, the overall series of patients assessed by Kita et al. (n = 208) is small for an 8-year series.

However, there may be some possible benefit to this extension of the D’Amico classification. It would need to be re-examined in a much larger series of high-risk men from a more contemporary cohort of surgical patients (e.g., from 2000 to 2010, perhaps). The possibility is that one could show that men in the very high-risk subgroup were, de facto, going to need immediate adjuvant radiation therapy with hormone therapy after primary surgery … but this will take some time to explore.

One Response

  1. According to this suggestion I am very high risk indeed. Whether this subcategorisation turns out to be useful or not, I am quite glad that I left the Netherlands for good (where I was not offered a maximally agressive treatment and knew it, and where a specialist apparently could not conceive that anyone but a specialist could know it) for Sweden (where I was, and got it). It might be that I had nothing to lose and something to be gained. Fortunately, I was educated in a forgotten age when science courses of several types were required for many college students in America. We studied for 4 years, not 3, for a total cost of less than US$200.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: