Salvage focal ablation for radio-recurrent prostate cancer


When there is a recurrence after primary radiation treatment, it is very tempting to try to identify the site(s) of local recurrence within the prostate and prostate bed and only treat those. The hope is that we can destroy any remaining cancer while keeping toxicity to the bladder, rectum, and neurovascular bundles to a minimum.

The alternative to treating just the identifiable recurrence sites (focal or hemi-gland treatment) is to treat the whole gland. We saw that whole gland re-treatment with brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) seems to have good oncological and toxicity outcomes. But the standard of care, other than salvage surgery, has been salvage whole gland cryotherapy.

Cryotherapy is one kind of tissue ablation technique — it irreversibly destroys prostate tissue, both healthy and cancerous. Other kinds of ablation techniques include high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation (IRE), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and focal laser ablation (FLA). There have been small clinical trials of a few types of salvage focal ablation.

Focal Cryotherapy

Abreu et al. compared outcomes of 25 patients who had hemi-gland cryotherapy to 25 patients who had whole gland cryotherapy between 2003 and 2010.

  • 5-year biochemical failure free rate was 54 percent in the hemi-gland group and 86 percent in the whole gland group.
  • New incontinence afflicted none of the patients in the hemi-gland group and 13 percent of the whole gland group.
  • Potency preservation occurred in 2/7 patients in the hemi-gland group, but none of the whole gland group.
  • Fistula occurred in none of the patients in the hemi-gland group and in one patient in the whole gland group.

Li et al. reported the COLD Registry data on on 91 radio-recurrent patients treated with salvage focal cryotherapy between 2002 and 2012.

  • 3-year biochemical disease-free survival was 72 percent.
  • 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 47 percent.
  • 4/14 patients (29 percent) had positive biopsies.
  • 3 patients (3 percent) suffered a fistula.
  • 6 patients (7 percent) suffered urinary retention.
  • 5 patients (6 percent) suffered incontinence requiring pads.
  • Half of previously potent patients were able to have intercourse.

Weske et al. reported on 55 radio-recurrent patients treated with salvage focal cryotherapy at Columbia University Medical Center between 1994 and 2011.

  • 5-year disease-free survival was 47 percent
  • 10-year disease-free survival was 42 percent

While whole gland salvage had very good oncological results, the toxicity was unacceptable. Focal therapy has undoubtedly improved over the years, but oncological results could be a lot better, and potency preservation was poor. Could another kind of focal ablation do better?

Focal HIFU

The Ahmed/Emberton group in the UK reported the outcomes of 150 radio-recurrent men treated with focal HIFU between 2006 and 2015.

  • 3-year biochemical failure-free survival was 48 percent
    • 100 percent for low-risk patients
    • 61 percent for intermediate-risk patients
    • 32 percent for high-risk patients
  • 3-year composite endpoint-free survival was 40 percent (endpoints= PSA recurrence or positive imaging or positive biopsy or systemic therapy or metastasis detected or death from prostate cancer)
    • 100 percent for low-risk patients
    • 49 percent for intermediate-risk patients
    • 24 percent for high-risk patients
  • Complications included:
    • Urinary tract infection in 11%
    • Bladder neck stricture in 8%
    • Fistula in 2%
    • Inflammation around the pubic bone in 1 patient
  • The authors did not report rates of potency preservation.

Focal Irreversible Electroporation (IRE)

IRE or NanoKnife has gained interest because it is less of a thermal-type ablation than cryotherapy or HIFU. (See this link and this one for recent reports on its use as a primary therapy.) It is not FDA-approved for use in the US, so its use is limited to clinical trials. An Australian group working under Phillip Stricker, conducted a pilot test on 18 radio-recurrent patients.

With median 21-month follow-up, Scheltema et al. reported:

  • 11/13 patients (85 percent) had mpMRI-undetectable cancer in the ablation zone.
    • 1 had an out-of-field recurrence.
    • 1 had a false-positive out-of-field recurrence.
  • Biochemical failure-free survival was
    • 83 percent using the nadir + 2 definition
    • 78 percent using the nadir + 1.2 definition
  • 80 percent had biopsy-proven no evidence of disease on follow-up
  • Incontinence requiring pads was suffered by 27 percent
  • Potency preservation was reported by 2/6 patients (33 percent)

Salvage Surgery

For comparison, it is useful to note the outcomes of salvage surgery in radio-recurrent patients.

In a recent meta-analysis, Matei et al. showed that

  • 5-year biochemical failure-free survival is about 50 percent.
  • Incontinence rates among patients of surgeons who reported on 25 or more salvage surgeries was 47 percent.
  • Erectile dysfunction was most often 100 percent (range, 72 to 100 percent).
  • Other serious complications included
    • Anastomotic stricture (closing off of the urethra where it was re-joined) in 18 percent
    • Rectal injury in 7 percent.

Salvage surgery sets a low bar.

Salvage Whole Gland Ablation

As another point of comparison, we can briefly look at the outcomes of salvage whole gland ablation. In two meta-analyses, Mouraviev et al. and Finley and Belldegrun looked at outcomes of salvage whole gland cryoablation. Focusing on the most recent trials, which used the most recent technology, biochemical failure-free rates ranged from 50 to 74 percent. In the study with the longest follow-up, Chin et al. reported biochemical failure free rates of 34 percent at 10 years and 23 percent at 15 years. Using up-to-date techniques, incontinence rates average 22 percent and impotence was mostly in the 60 to 80 percent range.

Crouzet et al. reported on 418 radio-recurrent patients treated with salvage HIFU from 1995 to 2009. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 58, 51, and 36 percent for patients who were low, intermediate, and high-risk, respectively, before their primary treatment. Forty-two percent suffered incontinence requiring pad use; 8 percent required an artificial urinary sphincter; 18 percent suffered bladder outlet obstruction or stenosis, 2 percent suffered a fistula, and 2 percent suffered pubic bone osteitis. They did not evaluate erectile function, but in primary whole-gland HIFU treatment, about 60 percent of previously potent men had diminished potency after treatment. We would expect further loss of erectile function after salvage treatment.

Importance of Imaging

Good imaging is critical to the success of any salvage therapy after radiation failure. A full body PET scan with CT or MRI must be used to rule out distant metastases. The newly approved Axumin PET scan, now becoming widely available, has good detection rates (89 percent) when PSA is above 2.0 ng/ml (as it is at the time of a biochemical recurrence after primary radiotherapy). The biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) numbers are sure to improve over time due to better selection of salvageable cases.

The other use of imaging is to detect the site of recurrence within the prostate. This may be followed with a multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy or a template-mapping biopsy to precisely localize the cancer for focal ablation.

Caveats

It is only since multiparametric MRIs and better PET scans became prevalent that researchers realized that up to half of post-radiation recurrences are local (see this link and this one). Therefore, it is relatively recently that investigators started to explore salvage therapies beyond salvage surgery and salvage cryoablation. Consequently, the sample size and the length of follow-up in many clinical trials is too small to draw reliable conclusions. The Chin et al. study demonstrates that treatment failures may not show up for 15 years. Whether those late failures are due to occult metastases or incomplete salvage ablation in that early trial is unknown.

We do not yet have a consensus on how to measure success. Researchers often use the Phoenix criterion (PSA nadir + 2) that was developed for external beam radiation. Some argue that the Stuttgart criterion (PSA nadir + 1.2) which was developed for primary ablation therapy is a better measure. Because nadir PSA of 0.5 ng/ml or less after radiotherapy is prognostic for long-term success, many look for that benchmark. Certainly, follow-up mpMRI and targeted biopsy are prudent steps to take 2 years after salvage ablation. However, it is necessary to have a radiologist and a pathologist who are practiced at reading an mpMRI and biopsy, respectively, after both radiotherapy and ablation. There are few in the US who meet that qualification.

Another caveat is technological evolution and the learning curve. Cryotherapy is now using third-generation machines that are increasingly precise at forming “ice balls” while protecting nearby healthy tissue. HIFU is in its second generation, and IRE is relatively new. As technologies evolve and as practitioners gain more expertise, we expect to see more complete ablation of the cancer and more sparing of the bladder and neurovascular bundles. Studies with longer follow-up may have used machines that are now obsolete. Studies with short follow-up may reflect practitioners on the beginning of their learning curve.

Focal ablation as primary therapy often (20 to 30 percent of the time) requires “re-dos.” The re-treatment may be necessitated by incomplete ablation within the ablation zone or missed bits of recurrent cancer outside of the ablation zone. Multiple treatments undoubtedly add to cost and toxicity. Follow-up is too short for most studies to know what the eventual “re-do” rate will be.

Summary Table

Below is a table showing some oncological and toxicity outcomes for select studies of various salvage therapies after primary radiation failure. It is meant to be illustrative only — patient selection varied widely. My main purpose is to help patients understand the wide range of salvage therapies, other than salvage surgery and salvage whole gland cryotherapy, that are now becoming available to them.

References:
1. https://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2016/01/13/salvage-sbrt-for-local-recurrence-after-first-line-primary-radiation-therapy/
2. https://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2017/08/29/after-failure-of-first-line-radiation-both-kinds-of-salvage-brachytherapy-are-equally-effective/
3. http://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(12)00575-5/abstract
4. http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/record/140338/abstract
5. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pros.22881/abstract
6. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13831/abstract
7. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13991/abstract
8. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/371893
9. http://www.europeanurology.com/article/S0302-2838(12)00302-8/fulltext
10. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13766/abstract

Editorial note: This commentary was written by Allen Edel for The “New” Prostate Cancer InfoLink.

2 Responses

  1. Frequent side effects of these focal therapies are bladder neck strictures and urethal strictures. A friend of mine gets a second TURP after salvage IRE now because of this. This is also a well-known problem with HIFU treatments.

    The SWOG S9921 study shows excellent results after 2 years of ADT following radical prostatectomy. This is an alternative without lasting side effects.

  2. George:

    These are potentially curative salvage treatment after primary RT, not RP, as in that study. Certainly, men can be managed for a long time with lifelong ADT, but most men want to avoid that if they can. They may be willing to put up with risk of transient urinary problems to avoid the side effects of ADT — it’s an individual choice. Men who have expected life of 10 years or less may want to forgo curative treatment.

    There is no question that toxicity is higher after any salvage treatment (after RP or after RT). Salvage BT or SBRT after radiation failure seems to have significantly lower rates of urinary toxicity than most salvage treatment. Because men who originally have RT are on the average 70 years old, an age when continence and potency may be diminishing anyway (especially after the toll taken by the original therapy), it’s difficult to separate the effects of age and baseline status from the toxicity of salvage treatment. As with all treatments, younger men and those with good baseline status undoubtedly do better with salvage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: