At the end of this month, on Tuesday, September 29, at 8:00-9:30 p.m. Eastern time (to be precise), there will be a second webinar in the series on the role of active surveillance in the management of favorable-risk forms of localized prostate cancer, coordinated by our good friend Howard Wolinsky and others. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Risk | Tagged: active, genetics, genomics, Helfand, surveillance, webinar | 3 Comments »
In 2013, Zumsteg et al. proposed a refinement in the NCCN “intermediate risk” classification into two subcategories, “favorable intermediate-risk (FIR)” and “unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR).” … READ MORE …
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Risk, Treatment | Tagged: adjuvant, ADT, favorable, intermediate, radiation, risk, unfavorable | 3 Comments »
The Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS), initially funded by the Canary Foundation, is a multi-center research study for men with low-risk disease who have chosen active surveillance (AS) to manage their prostate cancer. Active surveillance in PASS means closely monitoring men with prostate cancer and offering treatment if test results show the cancer is getting worse. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Treatment | Tagged: active, AS, calculator, PASS, progression, risk, surveillance | Leave a comment »
An article published in Communications Biology has suggested that all prostate cancer patients should be routinely tested fro risk of infection with COVID-19. This appears to be a questionable piece of advice for the average prostate cancer patient. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Living with Prostate Cancer, Management | Tagged: COVID-19, risk, testing | Leave a comment »
We have recently learned that Movember conducted a major landscape analysis of unmet research needs in prostate cancer that started back in 2017 and ran through 2019 but just got published in 2020. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management | Tagged: analysis, landscape, Movember, need, priority, research | Leave a comment »
If you weren’t able to take part in the “live” presentation by Dr. Peter Carroll on “The past, present and future of active surveillance (AS)”, you can now view this either here on YouTube or here on the UroToday web site. This is the first in a series of four live video programs on AS-related topics. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Risk | Tagged: active, surveillance | 2 Comments »
Eastham et al. have recently reported — in the Journal of Clinical Oncology — results from a randomized Phase III trial of the surgical treatment of men with high-risk forms of localized prostate cancer. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Management, Treatment | Tagged: "high risk", ADT, androgen, chemohormonal, chemotherapy, CHT, deprivation, localized, neoadjuvant, prostatectomy, radical, trial | 1 Comment »
The idea that most men will recover meaningful erectile and sexual function after treatment for prostate cancer has long been disputed by many in the patient community. We now seem to have some better data supporting the patient perspective. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Treatment | Tagged: erectile, function, QOL, quality of life, sexual, Treatment | 7 Comments »
We have heard from Howard Wolinksy that he and others have been helping to put together a series of four webinars on different aspects of active surveillance (AS) for the management of favorable-risk prostate cancer. … READ MORE …
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Risk | Tagged: active, surveillance, webinar | 1 Comment »
Perhaps unsurprisingly, it appears to be true that “AR gain” (see below) does indeed lower overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates among men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). … READ MORE …
Filed under: Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Treatment | Tagged: androgen, AR, ARSI, castration-resistant, CRPC, gain, inhibitor, receptor, signaling | 3 Comments »
